Re: Re: Re: [Harp-L] Tuning
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: [Harp-L] Tuning
- From: "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:31:19 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=sDxq4yVXixfli+GZQ1CBvQNuuEOXFZhZ9vN0TpiBF8FzS48aDydlfwihvEJOiYi+AcnIKvQFiF1qKaUshMzwEr/5Z+RJuJckMU3Fn+95KMItPynjtCvN+W5y/utTJ3V9;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
john thaden wrote:
> Upon receiving your email, I rechecked Pat Missin's "Tuning a
> Harmonica" description http://www.patmissin.com/tunings/tun8.html.
> I see he uses tuning tests which, when met, yield no beating.
> <snip>
> I have not seen a harmonica tuning description based on countable
> beating
Remember that we're talking about diatonic harmonicas (even chromatic
harmonicas are essentially diatonic instruments), not chromatic
pianos. Modern pianos are not tuned justly, because that would render
many useful chords dissonant and harsh. Diatonic harmonicas are
capable of only a limited set of chords, and it's possible to tune
those chords to pure consonance (0 beats) on most of those intervals.
If you look closely at Pat's procedure he speaks of "perfect"
and "pure" intervals (4ths, 5ths, octaves). That's not desireable with
a piano for most applications.
-tim
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.