Re: [Harp-L] Harp and Sax
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Harp and Sax
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:16:59 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=SxE2D5jLsaPQK+aOM3tRFdnQhYGzq3AZZVAdP1HEIDS5GboK0mcifp1wEONXaTCw; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- In-reply-to: <200802011918.m11JImJK029039@harp-l.com>
- Organization: Turtle Hill Productions
- References: <200802011918.m11JImJK029039@harp-l.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
Ken Deifik wrote:
<The real work, it'd seem to me, would be to work with the organ player <to
<carefully identify a few sets of organ stops that sound gracious with
<your
<harmonica sound.
True. Amped harp puts out a lot of energy in the 500 Hz-3 kHz range,
and organ can really saturate that space (or just about any other).
I'd just make sure the mix engineer understands that the harp is
supposed to be heard. A lot of mix engineers will automatically drop
the harp back or thin out the midrange frequencies if there's a
conflict, I guess on the assumption that harp isn't supposed to sound
very good anyway. That will just make the harp sound thin and weak, no
matter how well it's played.
Some very esteemed members of this list have described similar
situations to me on a number of occasions--in two cases, on records that
were the harp player's own production and showcase!
Regards, Richard Hunter
hunterharp.com
harmonica blog at http://myspace.com/richardhunterharp
Latest mp3s always at http://broadjam.com/rhunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.