If you introduce your discussion with a false or controversial premise ("If you would like a natural tone") the rest of the statement is irrelevant.
It is false because your test at SPAH, or wherever it was, refuted this for all time?
The side vent discussion went the same way as wood, the accepted theory among the scientific is that they can not make any difference. On my test, the consenus was that I would have had to have it machine blown or something to make a valid test. OK, maybe, whatever. But I don't recall hearing of any machines blowing anything at either SPAH experiment.