Re: [Harp-L] More Cadillac Records
Hi all,
Just thought I would throw my 2 pennies in the ring after seeing this movie.
I generally liked the movie. BUT I thought they could have showcased the
MUSIC a bit more. In other words, played entire tunes more often, instead of
snips. Oh, and there were certainly a lot of historical myths. They took license
to make movie points I guess. Like for one, it was Rice Miller that took the
Sonnyboy moniker from John Lee Williamson, not the Walter's stealing each
others name (although I have heard some stories about the Walter's Big and
Little claims). It would have been interesting to speculate what Sonny boy I
might have done if he caught up with Rice Miller down Arkansas and Memphis.
Movie point. I agree though, that portraying Little Walter as a murderer was
wrong. Maybe Walter should have just kicked his ass.
I think the main themes of the movie were racism and the music business. Not
the music. The producers scored huge points in these areas. Chess giving out
Caddys instead of money. Not being clear on compensation and royalities.
Chuck Berry being able to crossover, and then being jailed. The English being
more open minded to our music than us. The list of bands that outright stole
the music (at the end of the movie). We knew this, now millions more know it.
To me this is the value of this movie. On these points, and more, they were
pretty accurate. I am willing to bet that Marshall Chess is really unhappy
with the way this flick turned out.
Also, harmonica benefited greatly from this movie. IMHO.
One fact I wish they had included is this: Before showing the Stones coming
to the chess studio, they could have shown Charlie Musselwhite, Paul
Butterfield , Mike Bloomfield hanging out in those all black clubs, listening,
watching, and learning their trade. For me they were THE connection for the blues to
enter into a wider audiance. Also in the credits they had the actor listed
playing James Cotton instead of Junior Wells as Walter's replacement for
Muddy's band.
just a few of my thoughts,
Chris Mastakas
In a message dated 12/12/2008 9:06:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
martinoldsberg@xxxxxxxxx writes:
In the review of "Cadillac Records" on www.allmovie.com it says about Len
Chess´ (factual) recording practices that: "Purportedly, Chess simply cut out a
lot of musician's tracks without telling them -- an unethical move not even
hinted at here."
Is this true about how things were done in the studio, early ´50s? I was
under the impression that what they were dealing with then was one-, or
possibly, two-track equipment?
As for the film, expectation levels should be set to somewhere below zero
for this kind of undertaking. Hollywood is still making "The Glenn Miller
Story" over and over again, sometimes with drugs, sometimes without. Inroducing a
murder, as well as simply cutting out one of the brothers seems a fair
indication of the historical veracity.
cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
**************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and
favorite sites in one place. Try it now.
(http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.