RE: [Harp-L] An Over-Blurring Of Over-Bends And Over-Blows
- To: "'David Payne'" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Harp L Harp L'" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Harp-L] An Over-Blurring Of Over-Bends And Over-Blows
- From: "Bradford Trainham" <bradford.trainham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:38:39 -0500
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Date:Organization:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:X-MIMEOLE:Thread-Index; b=N1Q084NUtRDNgMtS7XZC7f0AHqtAX8ZW7hFx6oPM0BdJS5mIIshBamd4w/52/GDKDVWGP2h5V9o5GvNb1+pPL686nYqt3VqTLqd25rUvy7L2VMOxradayFDGPFikvnbQBiq65eEGiX4kd2hbKu+zoTCrEdxUlyLG7rVS/EBaQBo= ;
- In-reply-to: <86785.39884.qm@web1005.biz.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
- Organization: Home
- Reply-to: bradford.trainham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acj/4e7Z12LiDQ84QgmdTpk3FyJBkwABgEMg
So then..., it's really a curiosity of the architecture of that harp which
makes the blow-bends yield the same result as what we'd expect from
over-blows?
(At this point, a "Huh???" response would be entirely appropriate and
wouldn't offend me in the least.)
Brad Trainham
-----Original Message-----
From: harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of David Payne
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 3:50 PM
To: Harp L Harp L
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] An Over-Blurring Of Over-Bends And Over-Blows
IMHO, there are many harps that'll overblow better than a 365,
The E blow is the higher one, right? Assuming that, what you're doing
isn't an overblow, it's a blow bend like you said. The limit of the bend is
a half-step higher than the lower, opposing reed. In this case, you are blow
bending to it's natural limit, a half step higher than the B reed, which is
this C.
Dave
______________________
www.elkriverharmonicas.com
Bradford Trainham <bradford.trainham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On A Hohner Marine-Band 365, in the key of c..., we find holes 11 through
14 giving us...
Hole 11 - e-blow b-draw
Hole 12 - g-blow d-draw
Hole 13 c-blow f-draw
And hole 14 - e-blow a-draw...
My question... When I blow-bend hole 11, I get... Consistently a c, which is
a half-step higher than the draw pitch.
This would meet the requirements for the "over-blow' rule, but surely, this
isn't a true over-blow?
I get the same results with holes 12 through 14 on this harp, that is, what
we would expect from an over-blow, a pitch a half-step higher than the draw.
If these are really over-blows..., do any other harps exist..., anywhere
within the known universe..., that would facilitate over-blowing as easy as
this?
(Okay, but I had to ask...)
Brad Trainham
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.