Re: [Harp-L] inventions of steel proof
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] inventions of steel proof
- From: Jonathan Ross <jross38@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 19:38:20 -0400
- In-reply-to: <160894.68087.qm@web1010.biz.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
- References: <160894.68087.qm@web1010.biz.mail.sp1.yahoo.com>
Dave Payne writes:
True, although there were problems with making that reed on the
harmonica's minute scale... that was what had to be overcome. Also,
the harmonica itself was the adaptation of pitchpipes to a new format.
As noted, Hohner had already made steel reeds for the Harmonetta,
though that didn't cover the highest octave of a standard harmonica
in C. Again, I applaud Seydel for their design and the challenges
they overcame with their specific design, which seems to have
succeeded. My argument is not to diminish that, but rather put it in
perspective and the proper context, and use this specific example to
put other harmonica developments into their greater context as well
(alternate tunings, responder reeds, etc...).
As for the harmonica being an adaptation of pitch-pipes, maybe. The
early history of the instrument is not well documented at all, and
again we see many people springing up with various designs for free-
reed instruments at the beginning of the 19th century, including the
precursors of harmonicas, accordions, reed-organs, and concertinae as
well as other now abandoned forms. Exactly where they got their
inspiration from is unknown, and many of these early harmonica forms
arrived on the scene simultaneously with pitch-pipes, which begs how
the harmonica could be an adaptation of something which was only just
being created.
()() JR "Bulldogge" Ross
() ()
`----'
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.