Re: Re: Subject: [Harp-L] Harrison custom Harmonicas reply
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Re: Subject: [Harp-L] Harrison custom Harmonicas reply
- From: Chris Reynolds <c_reynolds2571@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=a4EiZaaw4s4lwmNtbYc57El78gdt2m6aNzVnyVPYhjDngMjz4juZXZFfQ3PSZ4XD9fbnHW/soI/I7u8v7iUjXpvUPig92TSMJjdbr9V5b3tTBaVWkqksu2Rdc728jc6F/h/d5Vz8M+Cwc6dknYzQf9kWuWJt1gVmDmS9EdMcldw=;
- Reply-to: Chris Reynolds <c_reynolds2571@xxxxxxxxx>
I've really been enjoying this conversation. I've only been working on harps for a short time but I can say that it has really become a passion. I'm constantly learning new things, I enjoy experimenting, and I've had some really nice comments from people. Am I as good as guys like Spiers and Flisko, nope, but one day I hope to be. I can say this that the comments in the message below really brought to light some of the things that I want to strive for, like doing the absolute best I can, putting quality first and quantity second, making sure that anyone who buys a harp from me is completely satisfied with it, etc. It was never my intention to work on harps for other people, I only got into this so I could fix up some old harps, but one thing led to another and I started having people ask me to do them, and well after getting laid off I decided to focus on working on harps. But mainly I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the great info, it's really
helped me out a lot, and I really appreciate the time some of you have taken to answer specific questions that I've had.
Chris
http://www.builderofstuff.com/harpsforsale.html
http://www.builderofstuff.com/harpgallery.html
Just a man, his shop, and a long list of unfinished projects...
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:28:36 -0400
> From: "James Sterett"
> Subject: Re: Subject: [Harp-L] Harrison custom Harmonicas reply
> To: ,
> Message-ID: <4803BE750200003F00008D45@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> I've purchased a handful of harps from individuals who have made general
> performance adjustments and full custom jobs. Of course, if you buy the $50
> general performance model over the $100 customized for Jim model, you simply are
> not buying as many adjustments (time on task)... but when you do pony up that
> $50 more... now, I've still got all my teeth... but I'd guess it's like getting
> custom bridge work. in my experience, the harp customizer has contacted me,
> asked me about my playing style, what I would like in a harp, etc, etc... then
> turned around and delivered (for no extra charge.) And, I also know that if
> something wasn't to my liking upon receipt of this harp, it would be
> fixed/adjusted post haste at no cost to the customer (no shipping, etc.) Bottom
> line, I've never met a harp customizer I didn't like. Be it the $50 model or
> the $100, they've all strived for nothing less than complete customer
> satisfaction. A lot of time and effort goes into each harp and I'll !
> tell you, if on some of my more oft used keys, a reed on an OTS harp may go
> flat after a few months of gigs/rehearsals/practicing, I've played some well put
> together custom harps that have been serving me admirably for better than a year
> now (then, you can turn around and send them back in for maintenance/tweaking
> for about the same price as a new OTS harp.) And those custom jobs, both the $50
> and $100 models, to varying degrees, are so responsive and fluid... it's really
> hard to go back to OTS (or even use one of the several OTS harps still in my kit
> bag.) I'm not affiliated with any customizers... I just dig a good tool... the
> right tool for the job. And, in my experience, that's what I've received when I
> made the extra initial investment (that's the hard part... everything else is
> butter.)
>
> Jim.
> www.mcmule.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.