Re: [Harp-L] PFOS song writing contest contract
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx, "Captron100@xxxxxxx" <Captron100@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] PFOS song writing contest contract
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:23:26 -0400
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=ckPJ3np4R/SaDeQBgbBQjljcn9kKAYN5QloIFUgHjUJYegxLeFUJ8FPAwzGSayNv; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- In-reply-to: <200709281829.l8SITRDL031759@harp-l.com>
- Organization: Turtle Hill Productions
- References: <200709281829.l8SITRDL031759@harp-l.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
captron100@xxxxxxx wrote:
<As most of us know, there is a documentary on harmonica in the works,
<called "Pocket Full of Soul", and they have offered a song contest, the
<winner to have his/her song used in the film. No monetary compensation
<was offered.
<After it stirred some debate on this list, the owners of the film (who
<are said to be nice people) had their lawyer re-write the original
<contract to make it less unfavorable to the songwriters.
<After PFOS revealed on Harp-L that some well known song writers
<submitted songs, i got inspired and submitted my own. They later asked
<all submitters to send in their names and addresses again, so they
<could "send everyone something".
<I rec'd my envelope as i was leaving on a trip and didn't get to study
<it, but it didn't contain the PFOS T-shirt i had hoped for! My
<envelope contained a check for $1 and forms to sign to enable me
<to forfeit any claims i have to the song, either forever or for 5 years
<(i forget). I assume every other songwriter received the same <contract
< I wasn't looking for compensation if my song was chosen, but it
<seems to me that the PFOS people want to own not just the rights to the
<song that wins the contest, but the rights to every song submitted. So
<even if our song isn't chosen to be in the movie, we cannot use it for
<our own commercial purposes?
<Comments?
Yeah, I have a comment. Don't sign that contract unless you want
somebody else to own all rights in your work in return for $1.
Someone apparently forgot to tell the lawyer who re-wrote the contract
that it was supposed to be LESS unfavorable to the songwriters. I can't
imagine terms less favorable to the songwriter than what is described
above. To put it bluntly, this is a blatant ripoff.
Whether this is deliberate or not, I can't say. I can only repeat that
the terms above are as bad as can be, and anyone who signs such a
contract is asking for heartbreak.
Regards,
Richard Hunter
hunterharp.com
harmonica blog at http://myspace.com/richardhunterharp
Latest mp3s always at http://broadjam.com/rhunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.