Subject: [Harp-L] The Magician, not the Wand
Rick writes:
"By the way, just scrolling through my emails while I let this one
'cool' (don't like to send without a pause for reflection - especially
if I think I might be upsetting anyone) I see this from regular poster
Elizabeth (hope you don't mind the quote, Elizabeth): "the 'norm' is for
feeling and emotion.....just look at SmoJoe's YouTube videos (among so
many
other fabulous chromatic players, including yourself!) and not the
oldstyle 'mechanical' style of playing"
Anyway, to quote from an old gospel record: "Now I wasn't talking about
anybody, I was just singing my song"
Regards,
RD
..oh, not at all, Rick...just as long as you quote me accurately....which
would be making it clear my post wasn't addressed to you, but to Chris 'Hammer'
Smith, so the "yourself" was about HIS fabulous chromatic playing ;) It'd
certainly be worth your while to check out his myspace link...that piece of
music I mentioned is really gorgeous (and beautifully played by Chris and his
band).
It'd probably have been better to have included my entire quote: "Chris:
Couldn't agree more...among today's chromatic players, the 'norm' is for
feeling and emotion.....just look at SmoJoe's YouTube videos (among so many other
fabulous chromatic players, including yourself!) and not the oldstyle
'mechanical' style of playing, and it truly is dependent on who's behind the axe.
Actually you prove that with your playing of "Pass the Test of Time"...a
gorgeously played chromatic piece of music on your own MySpace page. Beautiful! "
Rick you've made it seem as though my post was written as an "upset" with
you. Not so, if that's how you took it. It was written directly to Chris
merely in agreement with his take on the matter, and I want to clear that up,
since my original post sent in at 7p.m. NY time hasn't yet made it onto Harp-L.
I'm quite in agreement with Winslow too in this area...the idea of a
chromatic as a machine is an old (and kind of tired (to my mind)) perception, and
actually those players who still might play mechanically are nowadays the
exceptions to the rule, if all the players I've been fortunate enough to be
exposed to for the last few years are any example. Though I do agree that there
are some who might tend to hold onto the "old ways" of doing things (just as
there are in the diatonic world), they aren't in the majority of those putting
their music out for the public to hear.
Stevie Wonder is a step above, and plays his chromatic in a particularly
expressive voice than most other chromatic players, but because he does play the
instrument in such an innovative and unique style, doesn't mean other
chromatic players of today aren't expressive and 'speaking/singing' through their
instruments as well. We can't all 'speak' the same language.
When I began playing harmonica at age 4, I didn't know there was such a
thing as a difference between diatonics and chromatics. They were all
mouth-organs (in Scotland, anyway). I only learned/heard about the huge cultural divide
after joining Harp-l in 2004, later Slidemeister...and would have been
blissfully unaware that some see them as different instruments altogether had I
not joined this community. I own both, play both and also some Echos. They're
all harmonicas, as are Bass and Chord harmonicas. What really is the
difference? As Chris says: it's not the axe, but all in what you do with it.
I quite agree that Stevie does wonders with the particular one he uses. Just
singing my song too. <G>
Elizabeth
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.