Re: [Harp-L] Lone Wolf delay

["steve warner" <10reedsbent@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Michael,
I guarantee you will dig the Lone Wolf Pedal!    The one Randy sent me to
test is not going back to him........I'm buying the dang thing!

What Randy has done to this thing is keep the pedal in the "Harp Delay"
parameters and not like all the other pedals have, which have  WAYYYYY
TOOOOOOO much delay  that's made for guitar players. Of course we can keep
it turned down, but we don't need 16 seconds of delay.

BUT the main thing Lone Wolf doesn't suck tone.   There's a slight change in
loudness, but it is so subtle that you wonder if you mind is playing tricks
because we tested it so intently.  Actually, Mark Wison thought it was
louder running it through the delay while in bypass.  VERY INTERESTING!!!!!

 I had done the DanEcho mod a year ago to that useless pedal and it still
did not sound even close to Randy's box.  I ended up throwing the DanEcho in
the trash.  Too much gear and that was the most useless piece of gear I
owned.

I have no affiliation with Randy other than testing his pedal and now buying
it.  There's no doubt in my mind that it's the grand daddy of delay pedals
as far as tone is concerned.  I haven't heard the Maxon Delay that Dennis M.
uses and I know that's a good one too as Dennis M. bought them all until he
found the Maxon....except for the Lone Wolf.  I'm quite sure it would be
hard pressed to find one better than these 2 pedals to be completely honest.

Thanks to all of you who gave me a "Hang in there, buddy".  It meant alot!!!


On 10/13/07, Michael Easton <diachrome@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I just ordered one after reading your post...
> and listening to Ryan's samples.  I have to give up using the pa for
> effects since the 2
> vcl/gtr's  want to add a little reverb to their vocals. So out with
> the delay.  I was using the built in room delay effect
> to add to the miked amp sound.
>
> The Dano I had committed suicide after killing my tone and a crapload
> of batteries for a year.. Sold the Premier box when I was in between
> bands for a few years (loved it though) and overloaded and fried the
> Yamaha reverb processor after half a year of gigging with it. (it
> couldn't handle direct mic play thru).
>
> Hopefully the Lone Wolf holds up to its claims.  I've pretty much had
> it with modern effect gadgets. I've been checking out reviews on the
> Musician's Friend website. . I'll gig with it for a few months before
> giving a review. That way the pedal will have an honest workout. I'll
> get some audience feedback on it as well.
>
> mike
>
> On Oct 13, 2007, at 6:47 AM, harp-l-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Message: 12
> > Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:50:01 -0400
> > From: dennis moriarty <dmoriarty@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [Harp-L] Memory Man
> > To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Message-ID: <204427F3-60DE-46CC-A0FA-A2FAC6174F2F@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;     charset=US-ASCII;
> delsp=yes;      format=flowed
> >
> > Hey Warren. I recently bought a used EH "#1 echo pedal" which I
> > didn't like at all . Especially relative to my (more expensive and
> > much smoother) Maxon analog AD999. Obviously if we get together as
> > planned you can try out the Maxon with your Cruncher. What I'm really
> > interested in hearing is the Lone Wolf delay here:   http://
> > www.lwharpamps.com and eventually trying the Pog or Hog by EH. d
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
> Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
>



-- 
steve
www.thunderharpmics.com
fattest tone on earth!