[Harp-L] Re: future harmonicas and all that



Jonathan Ross <jross38@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
> Indeed, it's easy from talking to harp players to get the impression  
> that the harmonica is bigger than reality even in genres like the  
> blues.  There, the harmonica is an occasional instrument, and not as  
> central to the musical form as guitars, drums or bass over the last  
> fifty or more years.  As for jazz, well, the harmonica is completely  
> and utterly unimportant and unused in the genre, essentially.   
> Basically, there's Toots and that's it--Jazz fans and the 
> jazz public  
> seem basically to have reached a glut in the supply side of things  
> with one harmonica player, and no more need apply.

As you said, in almost all musical genres harmonica plays a minor role. But in blues the harmonica is NOT an occasional instrument. Guitar and vocals are almost always present but in post war blues, harp is also very dominant. No need to mention names but since SBW 1 up to this day there have been countless harp players who have contributed to the richness of the genre. Muddy Waters insisted that a good blues band has to have an excellent harp player. 

Drums or bass central to the genre? Ok, in the sense that they are essential to the total concept. But as far as influential musicians there's Willie Dixon on bass, Fred Below and Willie "Big Eyes" Smith on drums (Willie has moved more and more to playing harp). And this is not underestimating all the talented drummers and bass players who have always secured a solid foundation for great blues performances. In any genre, all instruments play their part and in blues the harmonica is very often in the leading role. 

Harri   





This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.