Re: [Harp-L] mic
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] mic
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 19:05:24 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=fInQdptqAYastZlgPrX8LeT9weh+ehWoqFawABRDBeJCY4p71tlAlgrwMcqTmYG8; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"michael hines" wrote:
> O.K. techies, i gotta question. What mic would you recommend as a best
choice for both singing and playing through?Mic should be fairly clean
sounding as befits the style of music i play. Just want to add a bit of
vocal occasionally. thanks
>
One reply to this question recommended the Shure SM-58. If this was primarily a question about a vocal mic, I might agree. But the question asked for a harp mic first, vocal mic second.
In my experience, the Audix Fireball V is flat out the best mic in its price range for a clean harp sound. It's not bad for amped work either. But for clean stuff, it's a terrific mic at about $100 new. I've recorded a lot with this mic too, and it works very well in the studio in a range of styles.
The Shure vocal mics have a big frequency emphasis around 8-10 kHz, which helps vocalists cut through a dense band sound. But it's not tops for clean harmonica, which already has a whole lot of energy in that frequency range. Add more, and loud high notes will make the audience wince.
The Fireball V also sounds very nice on vocals. But on clean harp especially, it's the best mic in its price range. It also has a volume control, which the Shure doesn't.
Regards, Richard Hunter
hunterharp.com
latest mp3s always at http://broadjam.com/rhunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.