Re: Re: Re : [Harp-L] Seydel 1847 inquiry
- To: Tim Moyer <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Re: Re : [Harp-L] Seydel 1847 inquiry
- From: Winslow Yerxa <winslowyerxa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=cHjIuCpmaxEDjGKO1BKhOvEqdv7zfQ0/yVr7As1ZrNwG9c5KI4cKoRnU9njyWTncYZtHzwic3R4qnDWh7+0OJ14CbJL9+xiM8pFGFYjXEREefxKfFpmNTj8GhAWFBr6J06dTHs6rPgVbmt1xOWobn3FV5uLAVvU8EjK1iwQWVjk=;
- In-reply-to: <f2ad8n+4u8g@eGroups.com>
Tim -
Someone mentioned reed narrowness (or lack thereof) as an indicator of
how well a reed would be likely to overdraw. Do you have any insight or
ideas about how basic design characteristics might impact the ability
of a harmonica reed to respond to a particular technique?
Winslow
--- Tim Moyer <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Winslow Yerxa wrote:
> > "not really good for"
> > Don't you mean something more like "does not come set up
> > for out of the box"?
>
> My 1847 overblows beautifully. Overdraws squeal like a banshee.
> I've
> been unable to make adjustments to facilitate them, but haven't
> resorted to nail polish or "turbo tape" yet.
>
> -tim
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
> Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
>
____________________________________________________________________________________You snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck
in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.