[Harp-L] Hole 2 and 3 overblows
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Hole 2 and 3 overblows
- From: Winslow Yerxa <winslowyerxa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 17:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=6gzof5DD7IbXtURlI8NTodVBQPZWfrFyBpLAhvu0xsm1UtkhEO1//nxMpjPy9wTytqUc4QJbMjOVQsELIHozlAeJUcdhtD/BnCl9ERsvBe1EZzXWl7njGfSJLcu+x/0no3bBGA1Fmjf6RWLmyNG+OUcbIif+yygjKZE/kSBig/c=;
Hole 2 and 3 overblows tend to be ignored as they duplicate other notes
available by more conventional means. Overblow 2 duplicates Draw 3
triple bend, while Overblow 3 duplicates Blow 4.
But they are useful.
Consider this: By playing overblows on holes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in
sequence, you have an entire chord 1 semitone above the draw chord,
produced by a consistent technique. I have heard Allen Holmes use this,
as have I.
Let's say you have a C harp and want to arpeggiate an Ab7 chord. You
could start with Overblow 1, the leap Draw 3 triple bend, then move to
Blow 4, then Overblow 4 and Overblow 5. Or you could just play
overblows in Holes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
Which is easier? I think the all-overblow path is smoother.
Second scenario:
You're listening to a guitarist or maybe a sax or even a chromatic
harmonica playing blues in G and moving smoothly (maybe by bending)
between C and Db.
On a C diatonic you can't do this with fluidity; C is blow and Db is a
draw bend. It will either sound choppy or sound careful; it won't sound
fluid.
But let's say you overblow Hole 3. That's a C. Now, you bend it up a
semitone to Db. Fluidity accomplished.
Winslow
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.