Re: [Harp-L] Out of the box vs customising
- To: <garry@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Out of the box vs customising
- From: "Haka Harri" <harri.haka@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:28:03 +0300
- Cc:
- Thread-index: AcdwHUTimuyNVyHpT1GvCV82aafDfQAW5nOg
- Thread-topic: Harp-L Digest, Vol 43, Issue 57
Garry, Thanks for a good answer. I will try out your suggestions for upgrading some of my harps. Only thing I can say from a debate point of view is: Would the literature written with quill pens have been much better if written on Microsoft Office Word 2003? :-)
Harri
> i'm also an amateur. after a little bit of online research
> (harmonicasessions.com
> and overblow.com mostly), and a little bit of experimenting,
> i've managed to get
> all of my harps to be much more responsive and easier to play.
>
> i don't do much to them, mostly arcing, gapping, and (lately)
> embossing. i also
> open the backs up on special 20's and hering 1923's. don't
> know if it makes any
> difference, but it looks cool.
>
> my tools consist of a set of eyeglass screwdrivers,
> toothpicks, a broken popsicle
> stick, a socket for embossing, and a feeler guage set. i
> also open the backs up
> on special 20's. don't know if it makes a difference, but it
> looks cool.
>
> the harps i use are already airtight. i don't do wood, so
> sealing is not an issue.
> retuning reeds is beyond my comprehension, let alone my
> ability. the only times
> i've gotten in trouble was from overembossing. need to go
> lightly with that, as
> recovering is a pain.
>
> what you might try is to tinker with an old harp, one that
> doesn't play so well
> anymore. adjust the gaps, maybe arc the reeds. see if you
> can bring it back
> to life. if you don't like the result, and are happy with
> off the rack, fine. you've
> answered your own question. if your results are good, you've
> given yourself
> an option when one of your harps gets cranky. as you get
> better at it, you'll
> find that often one hole, or one bend, on some harp feels
> slow or hard to hit
> right. pop the cover off, tweak a little, and you're good to
> go. it's very rewarding.
>
> > Don't know for sure but I believe a good part of classic
> harp has been
> > performed with instruments out of the box (if even that).
>
> a lot of great literature has been written using typewriters
> or quill pens.
> doesn't mean that's the best approach.
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.