Subject: Re: Re: [Harp-L] But when it comes right down to it,,
Blake writes in response to Tim's excellent points:
"Yeah, pretty much any of us has an infinitely smaller chance of becoming
rich and famous at playing the harp as a high school bench warmer has of
making it to the NBA. No, I'm not implying that we're "Bench-warmer" caliber
players, either. Do we need to resurrect the list of excellent harp players
who are rich and famous?
- BAT"
On 3/15/07, Tim Moyer <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> iceman wrote:
> > Old masters played because this was their soul's voice speaking.
> >
> > Modern players seem to want to achieve fame, fortune using the
> > music as a vehicle. They try too hard to control the outcome.
>
> I don't think the "old masters" had an exclusive on soul.
>
> In my experience, for every one musician I've met who wanted to be a
> superstar I've met a thousand who wanted to play their music to an
> audience. And there's nothing wrong with wanting to reach the
> broadest audience possible, and to be able to make a living doing
> something you love, something that comes from the soul.
>
> I think you'd have a hard time finding very many harmonica players who
> think their music is their ticket to fame and fortune.
>
> -tim"
.....So true, Blake. I actually spent the time giving this some serious
thought. Specifically focused on
those "modern day" harmonica players I've had the privilege of seeing play
in person....and then those
I've witnessed playing only via video/television/DVD's. Nary a one fits
the description of 'seeming to':
"want to achieve fame, fortune using the music as a vehicle. They try too
hard to control the outcome".
Can't imagine anyone possibly believing that to be true about harmonica
players. Given that there are so
few actually making a decent living playing harp..especially those
traversing the country playing gigs for
a pittance. Despite any acclaim....it doesn't put food on the table.
Venues barely pay enough to
warrant the costs of the gas and tolls (not to mention wear and tear on a
vehicle) for a band to get there.
Perhaps the reference was to folks like Charlie McCoy? (a tad older - been
around a bit longer
..so not exactly "young"?) or Toots Thielman's? Both of them actually did
become famous..and
perhaps relatively "rich" by today's harmonica masters' standards....but
only after years of paying their
dues, years on the road and playing hundreds of studio gigs. Hardly what
one might call "using the music
as a vehicle". So perhaps the description was of today's younger
players...I can't think of a single
one of them who don't have "soul", either.
One in particular with whom I'm very familiar with, has a brilliantly
expressive mind and is a wonderful
writer/poet (who could make a living in that field if he ever decided to
quit playing harmonica)....plays
his music from the very depths of His soul (which brings his audiences
back, time and again) ...and
has the infinite capacity to give everything of himself to help those with
less then he has....down to his
last penny...as everyone who has ever met him comes away with knowing.
I tend to wonder about and question those who deem themselves an arbiter of
what constitutes
another musician's "soul" and why they would describe that musician as
attempting to achieve "fame and
fortune", when the truth of the matter is that every harmonicist I've met
so far is simply trying to
achieve a relatively decent standard of living creating and performing the
music he/she loves for the people who love to hear it. Perhaps the writer
meant guitar players, since for the most part even a relatively non
top notch guitarist can achieve fame and fortune a heckuva lot sooner than
even the very best harp player.
Disclaimer: Only In my most humble opinion of course....
Elizabeth
************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone.
Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.