Fwd: [Harp-L] plagarism
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Fwd: [Harp-L] plagarism
- From: "John K." <jkuzloski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:47:43 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=KjRLNG7aUHn4hJIBy7u1mEkZQI6LMv2XtpC8Rps6V59ROlTPbK4BPSxHhADevrmOK1VgmEYfgqXjksyZeTOgIzIJBmNYGAchV6js8bD9v6VDlT6klKy237tb9TVG2gtn;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
I don't know about plagarism -- I'm no lawyer; but I sure think it's
in bad taste, remembering what Glenn said -- especially the "note-for-
note" part (and played in a different song, as if it were your own
improv. and not acknowledging what you did. It's a bit hard to
imagine that it would be unconscious "admiration" if it were really
note-for-note. Based on Glenn's description, I don't think chord
progressions or 3-note licks are really apt comparisons. (But, hell,
I can't even play my solos note-for-note!)
--jk
--- In harp-l-archives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Glenn Weiser"
<celticguitar1@...> wrote:
I heard a well known harmonica player last weekend and found that
this
person was taking solos note-for-note from Sonny Boy II and Little
Walter
and inserting them into other songs without attribution, therefore
passing
them off as original improvisations. I consider this musical
plagarism,
probably commited to cover up a deficiency in improvising. Does
anyone
agrees that this would constitute plagarism? It is almost certainly a
copyright violation. I don't want to name this person at this point.
-Glenn Weiser
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@...
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
--- End forwarded message ---
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.