Re: [Harp-L] Re: Home P.A.
- To: Bob Boyd <bboyd@xxxxxxxxx>, harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: Home P.A.
- From: "jazmaan@xxxxxxxxxxx" <dmf273@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:48:51 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=sqOwkTuUVGfj67OQ+R3CPbms1wqFwrNsRcLeo9Q0R2nsf1FdS8hqtq2cNKg0I2xwAbwgTEcN0HNsGnfYDj6lz5cH5laDZHhawKtMUrJoyskpcJjMTA+zvSBaGqaBKTR07NptDHa9zrftfPbwOh948Z1qU++B7pXhcz7JKIGwkn0=;
- In-reply-to: <02d501c7ae0a$0fbf74e0$6501a8c0@wks1>
- Reply-to: jazmaan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For harp I'd say it sounds about as good as a solid-state portable amp can sound - but it's still
too clean for my taste. I'd rank it in the same class with the old Danelectro Dirty Thirty - but
its only 20 amps, not 30. I'd actually say it sounds a little better than the Dirty Thirty for
harp because of its built in echo effect.
Oh, one more correction to my earlier hasty review - its got only bass and treble controls. No
mid.
--- Bob Boyd <bboyd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I really don't think I could ask for much more from a tiny P.A. system.
> > And for just $99?
> > I don't intend to use for harmonica, but if you don't mind the sound of
> > solid-state electronics,
> > it might be ok for chromatic harp.
>
> How does it sound for harp? Could it be a cheap amp that could be used as a
> portable one for harp. Have you tried playing regular diatonic harps through
> it with the wireless mic?
>
> Bob "The Captain" Boyd
> www.texastide.com
>
>
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.