[Harp-L] New Richard Hunter piece on Broadjam.com
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx, harptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] New Richard Hunter piece on Broadjam.com
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 02:47:07 -0400
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=OEE9Ru+2WsGOOtCJzKttDtKnTRS6NB2HcaqUS0bKzQUR/h2OFMIp7NQTNQfB5FyJ; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Organization: Turtle Hill Productions
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
Hi all,
I just posted a new piece to Broadjam.com. It's called "Kill the
Doctor," and it expresses my emotions towards the physician who nearly
killed my wife a few years ago. Unlike most of my pieces, this one
includes a vocal. I wrote and sang the lyrics. You can hear it at:
http://broadjam.com/rhunter
Please note that art is not life, and the song expresses my emotions,
not my intentions. In other words, I have no intention of killing
anybody, now or in the future. So you may enjoy the piece (if indeed
you enjoy it) without feeling that you are duty-bound to call the cops
afterwards.
This topic is pretty blue, and the piece is written as a 16-bar blues
form. For some reason I've been playing a lot of blues lately, and my
long-standing love for Charlie Musselwhite really comes through on this one.
The harp was recorded into the computer through a Line 6 UX2 audio
interface, using Line 6's Gearbox software (which essentially duplicates
a POD amp modeler in software). I went for a Chicago-type amped sound,
using a Bassman amp model and a 1x12 cabinet model, and I must say that
I'm pretty amazed at how quickly (like, 5 minutes, tops) I was able to
use that software to dial in a very convincing amped harp tone, complete
with analog delay and spring reverb, using nothing but the software and
an Audix Fireball mic. It was as if I was standing in front of the amp,
working the controls--it was that simple. The sound you hear on the
recording has hardly been altered at all from the original tracks--I
only EQ'd out a little bit of bottom end to make room for the bass.
Like I said, I was impressed. I would say that at about $125 and $200
respectively, a Line 6 UX1 or UX2 is a pretty cost-effective way for a
harp player to record a very big range of amped sounds for not a lot of
money. You can't play live with either of those devices--they're only
for recording, and only via a USB connection to a computer--but a Line 6
POD or POD XT will do that job for a little more money. (FYI, the
guitar--actually electric strumstick--parts were recorded through the
same device, using an amp model based on a Fender Deluxe.)
Final comments on the harp stuff: I did some early takes where my solos
were all over the high end of the harmonica, but I realized eventually
that to get the right Chicago feel, I had to hug the low end of the
harp. I'm glad I did. But I got some of my signature wide intervals in:
the opening harp chords, repeated at the end of every verse, alternate
between octaves and 12ths (1-4 and 1-6 splits, to be exact). The harp
used for this recording is a Suzuki Firebreath in Bb, played in second
position. I liked the sound of the instrument, but I found it to be
difficult to control, especially on the draw 3 reed--this is a problem
area on every Firebreath I've purchased.
Thanks and regards,
Richard Hunter
hunterharp.com
Latest mp3s always at http://broadjam.com/rhunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.