Re: [Harp-L] plagarism
That's it, Iceman. You sum it up right. Dan Axt
----- Original Message -----
From: <IcemanLE@xxxxxxx>
To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 6:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] plagarism
So many seem to have missed the point of Glenn's post. Quoting solos and
pieces of other music (Flintstone Theme, for instance) is ok as part of
the
repertoire, but when a "major name" harmonica recording artist performs
complete
transcriptions of other's solos - note for note - in other songs without
giving respect or mention to this fact, it just seems somehow dishonest
or
thieving from a moral standpoint. If I'm not mistaken, Glenn heard this
occur more
than just once during a single performance.
It's one thing to perform "Juke" note for note. This is a reproduction of
a
complete piece of music and is usually prefaced by "Here is a version of
Little Walter's immortal 'Juke'. It's also ok to perform "Whammer Jammer"
as is -
this one doesn't even need an introduction, as it is so firmly imbedded
in
the consciousness of all us baby boomers as what it is. It's also ok to
use
transcriptions to further understand the creative mind of the artist
and/or
further one's learning. However, isn't the goal to play creatively like
someone
else, not play someone else's creativity?
The Iceman
************************************** See what's free at
http://www.aol.com.
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.