Re: [Harp-L] John Popper
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] John Popper
- From: Larry Haston <LHaston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:30:10 -0600
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=blomand.net; s=spiritmail; t=1168918214; bh=SFX60bPVPK7fLA6aBSP5UYdIpx8=; h=Message-ID:Date: From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Virus-Scanned: X-Virus-Status; b=P9C7h8KxR4v3xF0E2Y/WviypBqS+PqECNYbIPgELrruoSxlJn 10eLjULe0r3Ef6aKmphS3/GnPZ62eXk4jofFg==
- In-reply-to: <eogt24+li2g@eGroups.com>
- References: <eogt24+li2g@eGroups.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
Tim Moyer wrote:
Garry Hodgson wrote:
"" <nonametribe@...> wrote:
I see John Popper /Little Walter clone rants are back.
I forget. Does that mean IMO/notIMO comes next...or is
Best Harp Amps next?
i think it's "wood vs. plastic". try to keep up.
:-)
Sorry, I dozed off. Did I miss "chromaticity on the diatonic"?
-tim
I'm starting to get nostalgic for "less filling/tastes great".
Larry, waiting for the deep freeze to creep across Tennessee
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.