[Harp-L] re: trolls
I wrote:
The original post was an ad hominem
> attack and basically a flame (if Mr. Popper is a list-member, which
> he might be). The best response is to ignore it, and to not feed
> the troll.
To which Bobbie G. responded:
"I don't see it that way. It was an opinion expressed and nothing more."
Trolls are often opinions--usually opinions are what gets people
upset the most. There's nothing wrong with an opinion, it's how you
say that opinion. Thus there is a world of difference between "I
don't think X is very good" and "X is a pimple on someone's butt".
The former might add to discussion, the later is a troll, flame or
whatever meant merely to denigrate and upset.
Bobbie again:
"As for 'flaming'... accusing one of flaming is often the first
flame, as I see it."
It all depends how it's done. A flame is a personal attack meant to
denigrate, malign and upset. True, calling someone a troll is not
nice, but it's not the same as calling them an %^&$$#--the later is a
flame, the former not, IMO.
"The issue of guarding our rights of free expression and guarding us
all from free expression by another is hardly a fine line to me. Yes,
I may think a question or comment is stupid or even 'trolling', and I
may feel responses are just as bad; but, the opposite may also be
true on either count, depending on my interest, knowledge,
understanding, whatever."
I never questioned anyone's rights to expression, rather I pointed
out that not all expression deserves to be respected or responded to.
Bobbie:
"The point I'm making is... well, I guess I did. The Delete Button is
your friend. But, open your Mind to control it."
For the most part I do, but every now and then I think it's better to
point out problems than simply ignore them.
As for Snuffy, he is 12 years old (his arbitrary birthday was
yesterday), and I do have photos. If you email me offlist (I can't
see email addresses through the archives, and I don't receive email
from the list directly, nor even the digest) I will gladly send them
along.
As for harmonica content, well, this is all list-related. However, I
got out my Suzuki Alto Single today and played around on it a bit. A
wonderful instrument, which I wish I had more time to properly
learn. As it is, I barely practice enough on the harmonicas which I
already have the basics of technique down. Still, I'll be trying to
get to the Alto Single more this year than last.
http://store01.prostores.com/servlet/suzukiharmonica/Detail?no=38
Also, now that I've finally overcome my mental block with regards to
Weiner/Asian tremolo type harmonicas I wish I still had my Suzuki
Baritone tremolo. It was just a fantastic instrument:
http://store01.prostores.com/servlet/suzukiharmonica/Detail?no=39
(and no, I have no affiliation with Suzuki, they are just being
really innovative and making very high quality instruments the last
few years)
()() JR "Bulldogge" Ross
() () & Snuffy, too:)
`----'
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.