[Harp-L] Wireless redux
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Wireless redux
- From: David Fertig <drfertig@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:10:50 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=CKAJnSto4aJavrFN1xL4ZGN3kO6wdbHt0CYgejiu6fCLBjRFWKTdje4MMZ6OsmmRCsBxAwa2Cmd7mEnyBXh4psc83xsJv90hhda3PCAdNt1u8BAz1JlxPQwvpjwQZF9CNNGhvW4MfnjtyqBeftqlzsDXWBGYbPlPbM4WFWX2NJc=;
- In-reply-to: <200701100143.l0A1hksP006909@harp-l.com>
Hi Honeys I'm home! I've been away from Harp-L for half-a-year, adjusting to my return to the USA. , and I am glad to be back among you . . .
Permit me to ask you hi-tech-hot-shot-harp-heads about wireless rigs.
I've looked through recent Harp-L postings re: wireless, and my impression is the AKG rig is the best/most-reliable/less prone to screeching etc.
My mic has an R5D controlled mag cartridge, I guess you'd call it a bullet-style hi-Z mic. So the AKG Snap-On won't work without an XLR converter, which I suspect would alter the tone unaceptably.
Thus I looked at the AKG Guitar Bud which, I gather, acts like the xmitter one'd o-wise put on one's belt.
My Quandaries:
Can the Bud's springed hinge be adjusted so the unit doesn't fold up and put the antenna next to the mic/into my hands or mouth?
Is the G. Bud a single-frequency device?
Or should I get a belt-mounted xmitter?
Should I worry about having only a single-frequency unit (cheaper, I presume), or should I go for the AKG "Flexx" model with multi-frequency transmission in order to avoid cosmic convergence of radio signals/drop-outs/UHF TV re-runs?
Bonus question: are some frequency ranges more likely to be crowded than others?
Seeking to be untethered so I can roam around to find good monitor, and even hide behind the amps to avoid flying longnecks,
-Dave Fertig
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.