Re: [Harp-L] Superlux link (as per Sonny's request)
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Superlux link (as per Sonny's request)
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:27:30 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=pdjtohA1Zi78MDr7IH3q7K8XNJ2JymHlW9ZUIzrcfFUFgcrqlnlfvZz2oGPoc1ax; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Garry Hodgson wrote:
<is its being omnidirectional a function of the kind of element used? or is
<that a seperable design choice? i'd think that would make it more prone
<to feedback. is that true? are there sonic advantages to an omni pattern,
<vs. unidirectional?
One difference--don't know if I'd call it an advantage from a harp player's point of view--to an omnidirectional mic is that it doesn't produce the bass-heavy "proximity effect" that a unidirectional dynamic mic does.
I do think omnis are more prone to feedback. I saw Charlie Musselwhite in 1971 playing a Shure omnidirectional mic through a Premiere twin 12" amp; he had major feedback issues all night long.
By the way, you know a few weeks ago, when I said ribbon mics aren't preferred for vocals? I dunno what I was thinking that day, but the fact is that plenty of great vocals have been recorded on ribbons. So never mind.
Regards, Richard Hunter
hunterharp.com
Latest MP3s always at http://www.broadjam.com/rhunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.