Re: Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: Loud extreme amps/ Re: Jason Ricci Acoustic?
Sheesh
In a message dated 2/14/2007 11:24:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
EGS1217@xxxxxxx writes:
iceman "analyzes" my post to someone else:
"Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:05:39 -0500
From: icemanle@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Loud extreme amps/ Subject Re:
Jason Ricci Acoustic?
"Elizabeth:
I'd think you'd be more tolerant of other people's opinions and not let
your
personal attachment and feelings towards Jason influence your editorial."
......First, it was a post not an "editorial", so kindly desist from
editorializing about my posts.
Second, clearly you somehow missed where I specifically said that my
feelings for Jason were NOT a factor...
"Gary is certainly entitled to his opinion, which will no doubt - not -
keep
anyone from going to see Jason."
....Wrong. Something said negatively about an artist in a public forum
such
as this CAN have a negative impact on that artist's income if someone who
read the negative press believed it was current then decided against
spending
their money to go out to a show. What part of that isn't logical?
...My response to what Sonny said was also colored by other information
about Amps you aren't privy to.
... Further...I was suggesting that his statement of "blinding volume" was
perhaps referring to something that might possibly have been true some time
ago, but not necessarily today.
....For that matter, just when was the last time YOU actually saw or heard
Jason play in person? My point was (for those like you who clearly missed
it)...is that even in these past two years he has grown so much as an
artist,
his band changed with a newer sound and vibe...judging him on something
one
might have heard years ago is simply outdated.
....So perhaps reading JUST a tad more carefully might be the better
option?
"As much as I love Jason and his playing"
....you do? How nice to hear that! I would never have surmised you did
from your earlier post implying he supposedly won the Mars award by
"fraud".
What a happy surprise!
"his volume and the sheer number of notes and sustained high energy are too
much after 45 minutes or so for this middle aged guy."
...oh. I'd no idea what age group you fell into, other than your several
comments of expanding your mind through LSD in the 60's/70's(?)...which I
might
have extrapolated to guess your age, but didn't bother. Most of the other
"middle-aged" (and older) folks who were grooving to his playing at SPAH
and
Buckeye didn't react that way at all, but as you say, to each his own.
"Does that make me wrong? No. Does that insult Jason? No"
....no, of course it doesn't make you "wrong". And if you'd just clear
something up for me, just where have I said that it does? Please point me
to any
post of mine where I've written "iceman or Larry Eisenberg is wrong and
insulting to Jason because he can't sit through a JR & NB show". I'd love
to
re-read where I ever made any such claim.
"You can never please everybody. Everyone is entitled to their life
experience opinions and should be respected for voicing such, as long as it
is not
stated as "THIS IS THE WAY IT IS".
The Iceman"
...Quite. As I'm entitled to voice mine, or am I somehow excepted from
having an opinion in your scenario?
"btw, having done workshops with Jason in which he only played acoustic
harmonica, he does indeed sound great without amplification."
....Btw, Jason sounds astonishing with AND without amplification, as anyone
who's heard him within the last several years is aware. Judging him by
something they might have heard years ago was the entire point of my post,
since
there's no grass growing underneath that boy's feet.
Elizabeth
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.