Subject: [Harp-L] Loud?
- To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Subject: [Harp-L] Loud?
- From: "EVedock" <evedock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:09:52 -0400
- Authentication-results: BL-106 smtp.user=evedock; auth=pass (LOGIN)
With tongue in cheek. I felt the same way about the C chromatic, not having any oomph and the key of G diatonic not having any oomph either. G diatonics where just a kind of dead harmonica. Too weak to play. I had a couple that saw little action for many years before I started playing with a Country/Gospel group. Same with the C Super Chromatic. Soft volume came out of it . But, as I started playing both types by necessity,,,, they began to be OK. I got used to them. Something just started to click and both G harp and C Chro are fine to me now.
I mostly like to play through a vocal mike and PA. After years of searching for "that sound" by buying old crystals, magnetics, Butterfield mikes, old tube amps etc; the sound that I was looking for was a vocal mike and a PA system.
A Chromatic sounds beautifully rich through a PA with a little reverb/delay.
There is a so called harp mike that I think has not quite arrived. It's a Shaker Dynamic. It has decent low end but weak highs. But to my ears, it gives the Chro a nice full sound with guitar amp or PA. But that's just me. I am in no way endorsing the Shaker. It seems to be a pretty poor quality mike. I'm not certain about my ability to judge it's quality other than I rarely use it. Except that it does well on the lower end of a Chro. So I guess my point is....experiment and find what works for you. (many great singers have saved their voices by learning how to use a mic) Let the equipment do the work. Ed
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.6/971 - Release Date: 8/24/07 2:59 PM
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.