Re: Re: [Harp-L] Comb material
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Re: [Harp-L] Comb material
- From: "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:49:53 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=CW2VKgM12PX2RoKLH58LA341cUTyHcTFR9fCoRHCa/7dqOOTFy6szU4p9YHvDdQUgufOY0zZffqXt1bXs0LSmL7k6fb5WQFQvNjjC6qh2C6S9NpssppFLeUGICktoGJB;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
Zombor Kovacs wrote:
> It is not obvious that comb material doesn't matter.
I think what's obvious, at least in terms of discussion on this list,
is that there is a preponderance of empirical evidence that comb
material does not matter, and with the burden of proof on those who
say it does, little has moved this topic in several years.
Tastes great! Less filling!
-tim
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.