Re: [Harp-L] Re: Richard Hunter and RP200
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: Richard Hunter and RP200
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:38:18 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=eYIcsxl+zU7h1h3CuCHSCE4MuYmwBMjbIn57TnH1Q+UShMinzQ1w83nmqlgdbyma; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Garry Hodgson wrote:
<Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<
>> By the way, I bought a Digitech RP350 a little while ago, but so far I
>> haven't made a lot of headway in programming it for the harp. It would
>> be nice if I could, because the 350 has the ability to transfer patch sets
>> via USB. But there you go.
>
>is that because you've been too busy, or it's more difficult to program,
>or its features don't work well for harp? or D) other?
I've been busy, and I haven't cracked the code on it. It takes time to get a feel for the way a particular amp modeler works.
It's also a more complex device than the RP200, and it seems to behave a little differently when I do things like change amp models, which makes programming it more complex for me.
And like I said, I've been busy. It's been more important to me to get my RP200 set up for the Audix Fireball, because I know the RP200 well, and I gig with it frequently. I even bought a backup for the RP200, which was an easier decision now that the price has dropped to $100.
Thanks, Richard Hunter
hunterharp.com
latest mp3s at http://www.broadjam.com/rhunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.