Re: Re: [Harp-L] Diifference betweent Audix Fireball and Audix
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Re: [Harp-L] Diifference betweent Audix Fireball and Audix
- From: "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:52:31 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=EGEttSLcXYQHc9T2SLlM0CEaIcU02yORseMg3mqA165+HBEfVZg7ddUJ6wbZjGcGdg0U6xXy3PkYhYrkbj5nIIbahA4Ea289C8EkCmiQgyDnmC8WNb+1h3ipCjG5fn2p;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
Bob Cohen wrote:
> How can you tell whether an individual Fireball has
> the offending element?
Referring back to John Watts' post:
> "The other difference according to the last conversation I
> had with [Audix] - the Fireball-V has the modified elment for
> better bass response and the Fireball still retains the original
> element. According to Audix the original is more prefered for
> studio use."
Sounds like all the non-Vs have the element with lower bass response.
-tim
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.