Re: [Harp-L] Diifference betweent Audix Fireball and Audix
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Diifference betweent Audix Fireball and Audix
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:59:18 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
- Cc: tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=QYWYjBYti1wNWCVsR8Uh1RIXjNOU13s0HINbZoZByOlksJrFhJYBZNeeytCFzqgW; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tony Eyers wrote:
<I'm a long time SM58 user, but I'm considering the Audix Fireball. There
<are two models, the Fireball (rrp $249 from the Audix site) and the
<Fireball V (rrp $199). They both seem to have the same microphone
<element. The Fireball V has a volume pot (very useful), but retails for
<less, despite this extra feature. Could anyone tell me why this is? More
<to the point, is there any technical reason to buy the more expensive
<Fireball, rather than the Fireball V?
Some of the older Fireballs (pre-V) have an element with poor bass response. The Vs have a better element, and they produce a big sound. That volume knob is also very useful. Get the V. You may also find that prices are better from dealers other than Audix direct.
Regards, Richard Hunter
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.