Re: [Harp-L] Re: Why is C not named A?
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: Why is C not named A?
- From: "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:09:04 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=d4EQFVlq7rt2TQiGcTxTrqQEpG6dPra1P+NWXZ2KxqeD9gvIlLfEs9jwpBmftyBMlPZnnC6beTdRVMiCZg8ntz+PKLzuSy9RovHbLe7dpDCiiannJcLDvA3se7Rr4tJj;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
I wonder if it's too late to take up drums...
-tim
Siegfried Naruhn wrote:
Hi ABC,
on the first view the subject sounds like Vern´s idea to the
question < .. Why is a rock called a rock and the wind called the
wind? <,
However, the explanation that the C might be derived from the
latin "cantus"
(song, melody, music ect.) only sounds well but isn´t compelling
either.
Here´s another idea. The German notation is: c d e f g a h, while
the
English substitutes h by B, so getting C D E F G A B.
Now, when setting A B at the beginning the result is the correct
alphabet
where the other 5 notes are already placed.
This means that the alphabetical order of C is obvious and doesn´t
necessarily
mean the first letter of "cantus". Why the letters A B got to the
end leaving
C
at the beginning I can´t explain either.
But whatever or whoever has managed that, the question is then why
the
English notation doesn´t read: C D E F G H I ?? which would be the
logical
consequence if the alphabet had been the basic idea.
Siegfried
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@...
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
--- End forwarded message ---
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.