Re: [Harp-L] Special 20 Tuning
- To: h-l <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Special 20 Tuning
- From: fjm <mktspot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:56:19 -0700
- Cc:
- In-reply-to: <F38163487B9C674E8EF6A3C1701AFB0201967EE1@dfstlhhqex1.fldoi.gov>
- References: <F38163487B9C674E8EF6A3C1701AFB0201967EE1@dfstlhhqex1.fldoi.gov>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719)
The current Hohner USA catalogue makes no mention of tuning schemes. In
the past the Golden Melody was listed as equal tuned. I'm curious
regarding the origin of the term compromise or compromised for tuning as
a description of the Hohner diatonic tuning scheme. Was this a Hohner
term? What's the correct term compromise or with the ed? Sans ed makes
a lot more sense to me. Rick Epping do you still lurk this list, or
perhaps Johnny B? Historically you two might have more of an idea about
these questions than anybody else. Fernando if you've got input I'd
love to hear it. fjm
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.