Re: [Harp-L] Rick, Roscoe, Chris and the rest of the family
The best jazz I've heard so far on harp is the Deb from Magic Dave
Therault.... no overblows /overdraws....but when he starts to solo it;s like
hearing his trombine untill all of a sudden you realize it's harp....
Ben Bouman
www.seydel1847.de
www.marbletones.com
www.marble-amps.com
www.harmonicainstituut.nl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Planet Harmonica" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <Roscoharp@xxxxxxx>; <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2006 10:53 PM
Subject: [Harp-L] Rick, Roscoe, Chris and the rest of the family
<< But...um... Rick, FY I - improvising over the chords to Body & Soul (I
think it's Eb,D,Dm,-just about the hardest modulation to play on
diatonic!) is
not why I play overbends. It's easy to set up that kind of straw horse
argument to try to make a point, a la: "The day I hear Toots play a
convincing
version of Roller Coaster on chromatic is the day I'll accept it as a blues
instrument.>>
Indeed. One might even be slightly nastier and say "The day I'll hear a
chormatic player playing Donna Lee at speed (and not the way Toots plays it)
will be the day I accept chormatic as a jazz instrument". Except for some
reason everybody knows that's b*shit. And yet Howard Levy plays it at speed.
OK, I think it's ugly, but it's not because of the overblows, it's because I
think Donna Lee is ugly, even when Coltrane plays it.
Considering the hardest pieces of a genre as representative of the whole
genre is silly. But then again I can't even begin to understand how whole
genres can be dismissed as "uninteresting". It smacks of either immense
pride or great lack of musical understanding.
<< You'd have to listen very carefully to tell where the overbends are on
my
recordings, which are plain old rock/pop. (Not " freak-out type material".)
No
one has ever said they sounded awkward & ugly, but it's true I can't play
the
changes in B&S. (Yet.) So what? How did using overbends get intrinsically
mixed up with playing jazz or playing in all twelve keys? >>
As to that last question, if you pardon my taking Rick's side for a second
(much as I disagree with him on the intent) the boasting of people just like
Chris on lists just like these certainly hasn't helped. Saying that if you
don't overblow you're not a consumate harp player, that any tune in any key
can be played on the diatonic, that because one overblows fluently one is
amongst the greatest harp players in the world can't help. Truly, it's
overblowing (pardon the pun) the importance of a technical aspect of playing
way out of proportion. Not unlike TB-ing often is, indeed.
<< When you say you haven't heard Michalek yet, well, then, you haven't
heard
him. Like the other poster who slammed Michalek the other day, how can you
criticize something you haven't heard? (See my long post #45003, near the
end)
Next to Howard Levy, I would say Chris is the best OB player out there. His
overbends don't stick out to me. >>
I agree that slamming Chris without having heard him is silly. I disagree
about your last statement in more ways than one, mostly because you're doing
the thing you're slamming Rick for : what the hell is an OB player ? Has
overblowing suddenly become a musical genre ? A style ?
Furthermore, and I understand you guys are all friends so this may be hard,
especially publicly, but I don't think his playing is *that* good, and I've
listened to Monk Alters Chi several times, and to many of the samples he
regularly posts. I'm frankly surprised at seeing you all jumping to Chris'
defense. I don't think that any serious jazz musician would consider Chris'
playing exceptionally good. And if you're going to set yourself up as a jazz
musician, that's the standard you need to meet. There's this place on Chris'
album where one of his solos follows a guitar solo (I think it's on Minor
Swing, or one of the gipsy jazz flavoured tunes) and honestly the contrast
in fluidity between the guitarists' playing and Chris' is audible and
painful. And the guitarist isn't like McLaughlin or Lagrene, you know what I
mean ?
I'm sorry Chris, this feels like I'm insulting you but I'm not. It's not
like you don't know my opinion already anyway ;-) I'm trying to be honest
here, and I see too little of that on the list especially amongst the more
advanced players, as if suddenly, because someone has worked hard and
studied long, it becomes touchier to tell him he's not there yet...
And of course, it's just my humble opinion, but I stand by this : Chris'
playing, to my ears, does not meet the standard of any of the jazz musicians
in my record collection. And it's all the more surprising (or shocking,
depending on where you're looking from) in regard of the serious boasting
that he does.
But the core of my post was not to criticise Chris. I just don't understand
this whole "OBs are Evil" / "No they're not" debate. Has anyone on this list
heard Don Les ? OK, with Mo Vint behind, his playing didn't sound too much
like jazz, but listen to the lines, it is ! And there's not an overblow in
sight. And I'd bet that there is not one person on this list (maybe even off
this list) who can play like Don Les. Not one. And let me tell you, *that*
fluidity of playing would knock the socks of some sax players. So why is
everyone judging the "jazz-ness" of a player based on his capacity to OB and
not all the other, frankly more important aspects of his playing ? Let
*that* be the new standard of *jazz* playing and let's see who passes or
fails ?
<< Incidently, I've personally heard Levy play the s**t out of Body &
Soul.
Raised the hair on my arms. Rick, maybe you wouldn't dig it, but I sure
did!
There are probably a few others who can play B&S. Maybe even Chris. Maybe
George Brooks. Maybe one of those South American whiz kids. Maybe a bunch
of
folks.>>
I just thought you argued it really didn't matter ? I was all agreeing with
you and suddenly you pull the carpet off my feet !
Who gives a damn whether anyone can play Body and Soul on the diatonic
harmonica ? Can it be played on the Bagpipes ? The Harpsichord ? Can
Mussorgsky's Pictures of an Exhibition be played on a chromatic harmonica ?
No ? Ah, it's not an instrument for classical music then. Can Hendrix's Star
Spangled Banner be played on a diatonic ? Popper aptly demonstrated it
couldn't (by trying it, gotta give him credit for balls, at least !). The
diatonic is definetely not an instrument for rock then !
I know you're mostly agreeing with me, Roscoe, but it seems to me there's a
little bit of you that's still half convinced that's where the legitimacy
lies :-)
Ben FELTEN
http://harmonica.typepad.com
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.