[Harp-L] XB-40 Tuning (was: Re: XB Altered tunings--Melody Maker)
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] XB-40 Tuning (was: Re: XB Altered tunings--Melody Maker)
- From: "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 12:39:49 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=OKMwhF3EhCtBEX1t44qyG0YZPDTSItieUUdzzprSbx8O0fNJTIOXYgqD6Jm4gc+Zgt0vKtxhjQYys72SKu7iCNToDu7YDbfrz5Q/lmqrISnmp6eeWbwNZ/6gE6BdH++y;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
If you carefully re-read Rick Dempster's post, you can see that he's
asking about the factory, stock tuning of an XB-40, not any retuned
variation. I've changed the subject of the post to help try and
eliminate the confusion.
Also, this is not about *how* it's done -- that part's been made
pretty clear -- but rather about *why* it's done, why there's a
difference between the depth of the bend on the lower blow E versus
the two upper ones.
In my offlist reply to Rick Dempster, I stated that I didn't even
know this was the case, despite the fact that I own one. Perhaps if
Rick Epping isn't here to offer an explanation, Winslow or another
XB-40 affecianado will help us out.
-tim
Fernando Bresslau wrote:
> Actually, the guy who retuned the harmonica will know the answer,
> since he is the one who retuned (or didn't) the auxiliary reeds of
> the XB-melody. As Rick E. said, you can tune them to what you like
> (in the physical possible range of course), to get bends as low or
> as shallow as you need.
>
> At 07:07 PM 9/6/2006, Rick Dempster wrote:
> > Can you see any logic in the fact that the 'E's on a 'C'
> >Richter tuned XB, bend only a semitone on hole 2 while the 'E's
> >at 5 and 8 bend a whole tone?
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.