Re: [Harp-L] new firebreath
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] new firebreath
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 13:53:12 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
- Cc: nick.kirkes@xxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=TGvhP8mxe2E6svsZQvg12hWVfWj1N7bjEYeh7klprVFssTn/uX25FoIBhjsIBe31; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Nick Kirkes" wrote:
<I received a Suziki Firebreath yesterday, D, to try it out. I noticed
<the first three holes, blow and draw, but especially hole 3, just
<don't have the volume or tone I'm used to from other harps (Golden
<Melody, Pro Harps; post my own basic gapping/embossing).
This is the third report to this list, including mine, that said the draw 3 reed on a Firebreath sounded weak. It's starting to look like a trend.
I now own 6 Firebreaths, and they have a superior sound, to the point that you can really hear the difference even on tracks recorded with an amp. But I have made a point of gapping and embossing all of them, and I paid a lot of attention to the draw 3 reed on every one of them.
Thanks, Richard Hunter
hunterharp.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.