Re: [Harp-L] What's the best sounding and simplest wireless mike system?
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] What's the best sounding and simplest wireless mike system?
- From: "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 16:49:44 -0000
- Cc:
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=jQA/0tNADW1t68PIsqMAiyGhYIftTVRa7t/9xYWjPuONwu5F7Gz0sko694ZAnm0D1ILv72og9OyBMvnZ99Jp8i37csPIR2+1zkoODHFjDErHn4QoyFf8/laqmsRNckKK;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
I wrote:
> The 545SD can be configured for standard LoZ XLR. Mine's wired to
> HiZ, so I can't test it with the Snap-On. I would expect that if
> the 545SD is set up as standard LoZ, it would work just fine.
> Makes me curious about re-wiring mine; I'll let you know if I try
> it.
I got curious, and tried it. Works just fine with the mic
configured for LoZ using the AKG Snap-On XLR. That said, I like my
Sennheiser much better. It's smaller, lighter, has much less mass
cantilevered off the front, and sounds more bottomy than the Shure.
I use mine occasionally with a band that uses almost entirely in-ear
wireless (one for each of the five memebers), without issues. One
of the guys in that band uses an AKG for his acoustic guitar.
-tim
Tim Moyer
Working Man's Harps
http://www.workingmansharps.com/
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.