[Harp-L] Re: Forgotten options for chromaticity
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Forgotten options for chromaticity
- From: Paul Bowering <paul_bowering@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 10:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=YyhjpYee8urtlE+Qop1CWdnSxu3kZKZIdEcFKQ1/OV18oO1fMbhswZuXiiJbHIeloBMKTHTeWFLFvjhTK1U+6jgDyY/+D1X/mboQc2b7SNQXNSeXloSq4i50R1iKgXYH9HbIQKYnhthe7DLt3plpeZRhsG4ZwNsubSTbwiHDoxA= ;
In regard to Brandan's All-Bender Winslow writes:
>It played like a normal diatonic but with full
dual->reed blow bends on all notes. Once he heard that
Rick >had taken out his patents, Brendan and Suzuki
stopped
>development on the all-bender. Too bad, because the
>responder reed itself is not part of Rick's patent...
I haven't minded trying new approaches (overblow
set-up, half-valving, XB-40, Overdrive) but I
understand most won't want to change what they've
become comfortable with. That's why I still say
Brendan's design should be pursued. Of course a
company would be reticent to invest the required
capital and not see a return. (I wonder how Hohner
views the success, or lack thereof, of the XB?) The
All-Bender however would not have the tone, size, feel
and playability differences presented by XB, Overdrive
or valved harps. It could essentially be a standard
harp with slightly wider hole spacing (like a
Bushman?). For those already playing this transition
would be much easier than the other current options.
New generations of players wouldn't even notice.
It's nice to dream...
Paul
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.