Re: Re: [Harp-L] Modes, was 3rd Position Tunes
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Re: [Harp-L] Modes, was 3rd Position Tunes
- From: "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 03:27:05 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=HxNUVfp+zA1DhzzFKEVu0GtaCFRijO/0ZnobrVEtzkpBzbsecxoxCj9Q5cW0vEnACF/hNSwM4vUOUIsklG1lp3OlksHiqKErAeRqOBY4cK/KI8Wuh1TzXz1GR6KTp3aI;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
Chesper Nevins wrote:
> In my mind, this whole issue of "do modes = positions" is
> actually simple.
>
> If no bends or OBs are played, then a position equals a diatonic
> mode (the Greek modes). If no bends or OBs are played, then the
> Greek modes are relevant because they, like the harp with no
> bends, are constructed from the diatonic scale only.
In my mind, this is *precisely* why positions do not strictly equal
modes on the standard 10-hole harmonica tuning. In the low octave,
you can't play any complete scale without bends of some type. So,
if you have to bend even to play a major scale in the marked key,
what's the difference in adding a few bends to play a ionian scale
and adding a few different ones to play a dorian scale.
I will agree that it's much easier to play in some modes in some
positions, but limiting oneself to playing only in the
mode/position "equivalents" makes it far more difficult to play
pieces that have interesting changes.
-tim
Tim Moyer
Working Man's Harps
http://www.workingmansharps.com/
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.