[Harp-L] Re: Studio charge for harmonica
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Studio charge for harmonica
- From: Tom Ball <havaball@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:32:06 -0700
- In-reply-to: <200607252101.k6PL19HU010067@harp-l.com>
- References: <200607252101.k6PL19HU010067@harp-l.com>
Chris suggested:
$1000 per song + $150 per hour
Ummm, well, I certainly admire your chutzpah, Chris. :) Wish they
all paid that much. But after 30 years of recording, I have to admit
that if I'd held out for that kind of scratch, instead of having 170
CD credits, I'd have exactly 3.
I've found that one must be flexible -- there are no hard and fast
rules. Sometimes a project has a very small budget, but is musically
intriguing. Sometimes the budget is bigger, but the producer is a
pain-in-the-arse. Sometimes it's a session that may not pay much but
can give you high-profile exposure. Lots of factors have to be taken
into consideration. But if it's somebody I don't know at all, usually
the first question I ask is, "Is it a union session?"
If the answer is "Yes," then no further questions are necessary --
I'll get scale or better. (Usually double scale actually, since
that's what they pay for overdub sessions, and most of my session
work is, in fact, overdubs.)
If they answer "No," (which is more often the case, ) I start out by
telling them that union scale is about $150 per hour with a three
hour minimum, and that overdub sessions usually pay double scale.
After they get done choking, I ask them if a label is underwriting
the recording. If they say "No," I tell them that I'm flexible and
ask them to to make me an offer.
After having heard what double scale is, usually their offer is more
than I would've asked for to begin with... ;)
good luck and cheers,
Tom Ball
http://www.tomball.us
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.