[Harp-L] 17-note and 12-note scales
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] 17-note and 12-note scales
- From: Richard Hunter <turtlehill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 10:19:28 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=svQdmgUtpaLxJpqcByiL1I3jIgDhzt/C0J/a74bJqJFpfaZVhyS6kUEWEVf8dmoE; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Organization: Turtle Hill Productions
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
"jimboogiebass" wrote:
<... old organs had split black keys,, the front to sound the sharp,
<and the rear the flat (or do i have that backwards ? ) as they were
<indeed DIFFERENT notes----anyway that was that way for many years,,,
<and an organ still exists with 17 keys per octave,, (a different
<layout than I describe above 17 different keys, not split ones)
I just checked Google and was able to find one reference to a 17-note
scale (http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=477165):
******************
<the chromatic or diatonic scale, contrasted with the tonic or equal
<tempered scale, is a musical scale consisting of 17 notes, where each
<sharp and each flat differ by approximately 8hz. It is not well known,
<as most musical instruments are constructed to use the equal tempered
<scale for ease of use. My above definition is also very wrong. *grin
<sheepishly* A chromatic scale is only segmented by 8hz between middle C
<and its peers... it actually doubles for every octave upwards, and
<halves for every octave downwards. I knew this, but wasn't particularly
<smart when I wrote it, and forgot. ;-)
************************
This terminology is definitely not common, and several comments on the
same web page as the one above note that this is so. I'd like to see a
picture of a keyboard designed to use this scale. Even better if the
reference describes how widely used such instruments were.
<would be interesting one day to count the pipes on some medieval
<european church organ... !!
The count of the pipes is not the same as the count of the keys, for
several reasons. Multiple keys can and do use a single pipe. Various
mechanical systems are used to switch from one set of pipes to another.
That's how those old organs produce different tones.
<... and String Quartets to this day play a different note for say G#
<than Ab.....this all ties in with the equal temperament tuning vs
<Justified that we harp players dwell on at times,, both are systems
<worked out to try and compromise all the original tones of the
<western scale into 12 notes... --
I was a piano tuner early in my career. A "scale" and a "temperament"
are two different things. A scale defines the notes available to the
player; the temperament defines how those notes are tuned relative to
each other and to their overtones. Whether we're talking about a
17-note scale or a 12-note scale, multiple temperaments are possible.
The point of the equal temperament isn't to try and condense 17 notes
into 12; it's to produce a tuning in which all 12 keys sound equally
good. In early medieval temperaments, intervals between notes were
tuned in such a way that some keys (the ones closest to C) sounded
fabulously, luminously beautiful, and others (the ones farthest from C)
sounded absolutely awful. That's why F# was known in medieval times as
"the devil's key". The equal temperament was designed to solve this
problem, and it did so by compromising pure intervals to produce a set
of 12 keys that all sounded pretty good. That's why J.S. Bach wrote
"The Well Tempered Clavier", which is a set of pieces in every major and
minor key for keyboard -- to show how good EVERY key sounded with an
equal temperament. Again: it had nothing to do with a change from 17
notes to 12. By Bach's time, keyboards were designed for an octave with
12 notes.
<a lot of the trouble arose with the invention of the piano forte
<with its physical limitations... and indeed its the necessary
<simplification of the scale grated on many ears and caused the piano
<for some time to be regarded as a barbaric bastard of an
<instrument... eventually its power and relative ease of playing won
<over the world and the other instruments and music in general
<suffered fo it but did become easier to play and learn
The piano forte was regarded as a "barbaric bastard of an instrument?" I
really need to see some scholarly references for that one. The piano
forte was a relatively late invention too, well after the harpsichord
and organ, both of which had the same physical limitation in terms of
keyboard design.
In any case, I'm sure of one thing: the vast majority of western
musicians haven't been writing music for a 17-note scale for hundreds of
years. For that matter, most modern instruments couldn't easily play
such music.
Thanks and regards, Richard Hunter
hunterharp.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.