[Harp-L] Re: Back to the Woodshed
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] Re: Back to the Woodshed
- From: Pete Remenyi <pmremenyi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:26:30 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4y2ns6yD1OQYQaclCP+YDyrqLFD+i2H+rTehlVz+y/njN4+oTZXeI+fe5+TI79owpFQA/AyAG1VVf4NBdo3SbwFYzrLABMHzGFHpDv9PsC3vICRn0fULnSM/UhZsXcZKX+E8H7MoskBLDuuXklYSWvgcX8W8Vpd+PWEgL3jaVoE= ;
- In-reply-to: <200601221539.k0MFd1cZ009151@harp-l.com>
Just a thought. You are setting the bar awfully high
for yourself expecting Butterfield quality when you
listen to yourself play. I know it's been discussed a
lot... I'm not intending to start another Butterfield
thread, but if I play even 75% as good, I'm estatic.
I've been playing about as long as you, most of it
professionally in both blues and country, and
bluegrass genres.
Pete Remenyi
>Got the Green Bullet. Got the tweed champ. Laid down
the tracks. >Listen back expecting at least
Butterfield quality. Huh. It >was.passable. C-
>performance.Hesitant, lacklustre, poor attack.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.