Re: [Harp-L] Quiet Progress

To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Quiet Progress
From: "Dave Murray" <dlmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 08:57:22 -0700
Organization: Not very
References: <dr08qn+jhb7@eGroups.com>
Reply-to: Dave Murray <dlmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I have been watching this discussion re: the use of OBs with a lot
of interest.  While some people argue the "can it be done/should it
be done" questions, folks like Tinus are posting stuff like this
that just blows the discussion out of the water:

http://overblow.com/mp3/II_V_I.mp3

I've been letting that play as background on my computer for several days. It hasn't gotten old yet.

Peace and music,
Dave

Follow-Ups:
- [Harp-L] Tinus' site (Overblow.com)
  - From: Gary Lehmann

References:
- [Harp-L] Quiet Progress
  - From: Tim Moyer

Previous by Date: [Harp-L] Studio's and saying no?
Next by Date: [Harp-L] Re: TONE
Previous by Thread: Re: [Harp-L] Quiet Progress
Next by Thread: [Harp-L] Tinus' site (Overblow.com)
Harp-L January 2006 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
Harp-L list archive Table of Contents
More information about the Harp-L mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.