[Harp-L] "Wrong" Notes & Hedged Bets; or, What Price Chromacity?
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Harp-L] "Wrong" Notes & Hedged Bets; or, What Price Chromacity?
- From: Aeskow@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:11:12 EST
- Cc:
It seems to me that all this provocative byplay about overblows, Miles'
clunkers, and how much slack we should cut for "slurred" notes is obscuring a
simple but crucial question: the emotional impact of a particular song at a
particular moment. I think the argument has gotten wobbly and kind of mis-shapen
as people rush to defend either their playing or their sense of aesthetics,
but at its core, for me, it's just that simple--is the pursuit, or
achievement, of full chromacity on a diatonic serving the tune, or vice versa? I
should point out up front that I don't overblow--have not yet felt a strong enough
impulse to do the work, in the larger context of study and playing, and find
that my own needs as a player can be met either with valved diatonics or on
chromatic--but speaking now just as a listener, I feel that the pursuit of a
full palette of notes can sometimes get in the way of the song. And not in
the way that's being discussed--i.e. hitting "wrong" notes; it's not that hard
to transform "wrong" notes into "right" ones retroactively if you're
comfortable with jazz scales, or to simply let them hang there, Miles-style, as part
of the song's human statement. Rather, for me, I get the feeling sometimes
that the laudable goal of chromacity can make the playing too intellectual.
Given the challenge of overblowing notes with the same fullness and resonance
as "regular" ones, it seems to me that players may be TOO concerned with
avoiding clunkers--with the result being that bets are hedged, and 100%
commitment to each note is often difficult (or impossible) for players to sustain.
In no way is this meant to disparage the work--I admire it--the point here is
just that ANYTHING that gets in the way of pure focus on The Note, whether
it's for the player or the listener, breaks the flow of the experience.
Whether it's concern for pitch, or a thin-ness of tone, it's perfectly
understandable--but when it gets between the harp and the audience, as I think it often
can, technique can obscure rather than illuminate.
That said, the pursuit is obviously a noble one, and the debate's inspired
me to play.
Peace and Respect,
Johnny T
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.