Re: [Harp-L] comb material (was big sound)
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] comb material (was big sound)
- From: Zombor Kovacs <zrkovacs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:03:50 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DorSIa1ddDTalnYVs0UniPooxHENTJ+NEy4RiwZKwdqpqx0SnxoJh2rY2/zAVvT4ZxBfU5bdVd1Wzwve4Cu1OPbty0QxM19gopELzjnKjIqvMLVoGD7KzpOxrAz+/eMcOGICkAJR16i6/B9cXhTyInxctELaeFflxVWuwV4Fc/w= ;
- In-reply-to: <3.0.3.32.20060220200728.00744a84@pop.paradise.net.nz>
I have already read that article. What is the point
making different comb materials then?
What is the way of amplifying the sound in a
non-electronic way then?
--- G <gigs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:37:08 -0500
> From: "Jonathan R. Ross" <jross38@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Harp-L] comba material (was big sound)
> To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Zombor wrote:
> >> "I am looking for some info on harp sound."
> > If you search the archives with the words "comb
> material" you'll find a
> > veritable treasure trove of information on the
> subject of comb material
> > and the sound of harmonicas. There have been very
> large debates over
> > and again on the subject.
>
> I think this article summarises the entire ongoing
> debate adequately...
>
http://www.angelfire.com/music/harmonica/combmaterials.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
> Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.