Fwd: [Harp-L] Re: Trills on Harp - other methods
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Fwd: [Harp-L] Re: Trills on Harp - other methods
- From: "Winslow Yerxa" <winslowyerxa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 21:45:41 -0000
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com; b=ohQw13HNnu5h5wqqQj1g1xWS5xX2XszxN2ZrXXVVfQiVvtXhAGwsW28Qd44B/ARLm5wQgJv5vSXjCaknbWKEwkqSDKbKfyT8YGutCK2wElVJkaQLhRVE2ZL5xqcO/0MX;
- Sender: notify@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
--- In harp-l-archives@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Jonathan Metts"
<jonathan@...> wrote:
> If a trill is alternating between two adjacent
> scale notes, there should be tons of trills available
> on the diatonic, not just the one he mentions. What
> about Bend 4 - Draw 4, or Blow 5 - Draw 5?
> Depends on what scale you're using, but my point
> is that you could alternate between many sets of
> notes very quickly, if your technique is well honed.
Actually, Jonathan, you are right. I was speaking purely of the
action of alternating adjacent holes on the same breath - that most
of these are not true trills. In addressing that I didn't consider
the other possible ways of creating true trills.
You're also right that considerable technique is required to properly
articulate a bent and an unbent note as distinct notes, and to
alternate blow and draw without sounding choppy. And in both
instances, keeping up a quick, steady rate of alternation is another
challenge.
Winslow
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.