[Harp-L] Le-Riff (Yessssssss!) (was: Le-Riff (Noooooooo!)) - correction
- To: <billybudd1313@xxxxxxxxx>, "harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] Le-Riff (Yessssssss!) (was: Le-Riff (Noooooooo!)) - correction
- From: scott gold <scottgold@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:34:47 +0900
- Cc:
- Thread-index: AcYoYgRCQq0nPJRVEdqSTQARJDvsbg==
- Thread-topic: [Harp-L] Le-Riff (Yessssssss!) (was: Le-Riff (Noooooooo!)) - correction
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.1.051004
sorry correction actually I don¹t have the Sumlin¹s heart & soul cd
right now
but I think it was James Cotton playing the harp on Juke there?
-sg
>
> as participant in the Le Riff debate so long ago, I have to disagree with
> Billy Bud (his initial impression, anyway).
>
> to me it was precisely because to the unfathomable magic and spirit of this
> biblical harp tune that so many people like myself became fascinated with
> studying it. sure, any song, poetry, painting, etc. should be listened to or
> viewed in a purely aesthetic manner devoid of cold analysis, etc. in the case
> of Juke we had already been there and have enjoyed it for it¹s beauty¹s
> sake. but, for a brief moment in time, a number of people wanted to look at
> Juke from a another technical even scientific level. but what may seem to
> one as a scientific study, may reveal certain aesthetic issues that we never
> expected.
>
> in fact, I learned so much from that debate and in fact, complete changes my
> opinion. specifically, I had always played Le Riff in pucker and was
> convinced it was a single 6, primarily b/c it was difficult for me to do and
> seemed unnatural.. but thinking seriously about posts that claim it was a 3-6
> blow, I tried playing Le riff in TB and lo and behold, I found how easy and
> natural it is to hit the 3-6 in TB embouchure. listening with fresh
> (TB-ears), I converted to become 3-6 believer. so the debate helped me
> understand LW¹s playing, helped my playing, and the discussion became for me,
> at least, a classic harp-l story a fine example of what Harp-l is about.
>
> I do agree with Billy Bud that is also very pertinent and wonderful to listen
> to others play Juke and see how they do it. I was unaware of Clarke¹s Le
> Riff quote and have placed my order. I find listening to versions by LW (alt
> take), George Smith (two versions), Charlie Musslewhite, James Cotton, Billy
> Branch (both versions), Hubert Sumlin, Big Joe Yushin, and others, quite
> illuminating.
>
> may the quest continue!
>
> yours in LeRifflednessless,
>
> -sg
> tokyo
>
>
>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:02:29 -0800 (PST)
>> From: Dan <billybudd1313@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [Harp-L] Le-Riff (Noooooooo!)
>> To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> Dear harp-L world,
>>
>> Listening to William Clarke's "Live in Germany" Track 3 "Lookin' To The
>> Future" Just about 1 min 35 seconds in:
>>
>> Clarke plays a version of le-Riff twice through. To my hearing, he gets a
>> sound very reminiscent of LW's much debated lick.
>>
>> On the one hand, Clarke is gone too (sadly) so there'll be no asking him
>> what lick.
>>
>> On the other, perhaps some of you crazy's (affectionate use of crazy) may
>> want to give the clip a listen. I think Walter and Bill hit 3-6 with amp
>> overtones. Perhaps this new info will shed new light for some ears. Perhaps
>> not.
>>
>> Dan G.
>>
>> Major caveat:
>>
>> When I was a boy of 19-21 just starting out on harp, I joined an internet
>> list called Harp-L. On this list, it seemed they talked incessently about
>> this one lick. At the time, (and somewhat still) I saw the discussion as an
>> academic pursuit, completely missing the point and spirit of its creator, and
>> the context of the music he was trying to play. I left Harp-L for years
>> because I felt my time was better spent playing than analyzing minutia.
>>
>> Well, much time has passed, and now I am better at skimming Harp-L and
>> ignoring that which doesn't interest me. I think I can actually help out
>> some too. I still think the Le-Riff debate borders on insanity, so please
>> forgive me for my seemingly hipocritical observation and subsequent digging
>> up of a very well beaten horse.
>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.