RE: [Harp-L] Mustang Sally
- To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [Harp-L] Mustang Sally
- From: "Eugene Ryan" <ryan.eugene@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:09:27 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Ncei0cIdfDXGMQrElCzlrNnJPkr90GqOFZu4I90ljHHrinf6YJhDt0tLeipJA0k49eRebnrs2ZQnSYRTCCZe0D9L5/sR0WvAMMp1XIdW5YFF4hUI0t/Qx9l+P7ZFn+ugmh+Htx0csO7BNRETdMlugdQtCeL5Pm6TqNlXB3Z5Ctk=
Harri writes:
If I could play as good as Shakey Horton I would still probably do Sally
when
the audience wants it.
There's no harm in that. I think that bands get sick of Sally as it is one
of the most requested songs (the most requested song?) of the formula "can
you play X", where X is not equal to what you're currently playing. And
often the requested song is not in the style that you're playing on the
night. I had a request for Led Zeppelin recently. The line up was harp,
trumpet, piano, bass and drums...
The problem is that if you were to do *only* what the audience think they
want, then you would play only covers. They may well enjoy the new music
you've carefully arranged - but how will they know that unless you've tried
it on them? I think that's another thing that annoys musicians: they put a
lot of effort in rehearsing their material, with good arrangements - and to
be asked for something completely different or out of context seems to
dismiss that effort. It's kind of "the band = my personal jukebox"
phenomenon.
I quite like Cissy Strut, by the way. I'd rather see Cissy Strut
than Sally Mustang - is mustang a verb? :-)
"All you got to do is ride around Sally.."
1 2 3 4... yahoo... we're off
Eugene
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.