Re: [Harp-L] Tunings: PR vs MM vs CT
- To: "harp-l" <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Tunings: PR vs MM vs CT
- From: "Fred & Sylvia" <fsstov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:35:22 -0600
- Cc:
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=hRl7yOqP9W2fbQ5up6oho7YLtNkzUXIfuqyUTcSi/T09bqH1aRlf4BC4Hq3vKvt2; h=Received:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Thread-index: AccVbxPFIhNh5ZHlRMyKU3OqH5XwTA==
Hi Joe
You wrote:
"My question is: what is the difference between the MM and the CT? (I am not
familiar with the Paddy Richter as I don't want to learn another tuning)."
MM is the same as CT except the 3 blow raised a whole step.
PR is the same as Std Tuning except the 3 blow raised a whole step.
Thanks for the song list. I'll check these to see whether MM has any
advantage for them vs. PR.
Fred S
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.