[Harp-L] RE: Required Reading
Dan., Great thread, it's fascinating to see where these things will go, and you've really started something that's covering, IMO, extremely interesting and useful information for anyone who's ever played or listened to music...
Jim.
>>> Dan. <billybudd1313@xxxxxxxxx> 4/20/2006 2:06 PM >>>
In response to Mr. Ross, (I say this while smiling, please don't read in any negative emotion whatsoever)
Snuffy writes:
"it is meaningless, personal and simply a fun if frustrating
exercise"
In response to my recent top-five challenge.
I say: You just described just about every hobby ever attempted, including playing the harmonica. We celebrate guys who throw a ball into a hoop for crying out loud... but we have fun doing it.
I hate "top lists too" because they are usually done by people with an agenda.
My goal is not to be annoying. My goal is to mine this huge "community" for a little gold. I'm a scientist. OK, I admit it. . . I"m a nerd too. I thought of a question, and I sought data to get closer to the answer. It's a subjective world, and you can't please everybody, but with such a large data pool, certain broad trends are likely to surface.
If just one new harmonica player gets hip to Miles Davis (having only, for ex. studied harp tunes prior) then the exercise adds value.
We so often discuss gear, techniques, and theory, but we shy away from the subjective. We all agree to disagree, and attempt to avoid conflicts, however, I think Harp-L is a little thin on the art department sometimes.
IMHO It's ok to study the way music makes us feel. It's ok to try and ID a handfull of records that just about EVERYBODY loves. It makes you think, "you know, there's something about that music. . . How can I learn from it, and aid my own musicianship/art/playing etc?"
Great lists so far. I'm compiling them. It'll probably add more value to the world than the last antibiotic I worked on in "real life".
Dan G.
www.jdbone.com
Message: 24
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 19:39:18 -0400
From: Jonathan Ross <jross38@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Harp-L] lists
I truly despise lists of "top five" and so forth. It's the same
problem I have with Grammys or the Oscars--art cannot be judged the
same way a footrace can.
Now that I've said that, here's my list--the caveat, of course, is
that it is meaningless, personal and simply a fun if frustrating
exercise. I'm limiting myself to albums here, which again makes
things difficult. No particular order, they are just numbered so
that I don't go too far.
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.