RE: [Harp-L] Re: Another way to look at music strange as it might seem
- To: "Tim Moyer" <wmharps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Harp-L] Re: Another way to look at music strange as it might seem
- From: "Eric Neumann" <eneumann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 08:54:35 -0500
- Cc:
- Thread-index: AcZjUvggqWdCXU3USRSheGM9+cK5AQAZW/ag
- Thread-topic: [Harp-L] Re: Another way to look at music strange as it might seem
If we accept the theory that majority rules, I say that we can turn the
tables and see that .6% of all the possibilities are in fact - crap. Now
that's more like it in my opinion.
Conversely yours...
-----Original Message-----
From: harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tim Moyer
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:45 PM
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] Re: Another way to look at music strange as it
might seem
"Chris Michalek" <chris@...> wrote:
> geometry goes out the window when it comes to harp. There are
> 144 possible ways to play a simple tune on the diatonic harmonica
Garry Hodgson wrote:
> true, but 99.4% of them are crap, leaving only 1.43 good ways.
Hmm, I get 144 * .006 (.6%) = 0.864 which is less than one good way.
Unless, of course, you consider alternate tunings, which raises the
number of possible ways to play the tune in the first place, and
therefore, the statistical possibility of finding a non-crappy way.
-tim
Tim Moyer
Working Man's Harps
http://www.workingmansharps.com/
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.